(Florian Kolb (known as github.com/corgisolutions, t.me/florcorgi) Authorized representative of the Recipients named below
corgi@aster.cx
King.sells (694885449059008614), theuselesscreator (1189666481278025860), drifted._. (1403117349699059732), tagdoesnothing (972926959971627049), playfab.dll (1058128533089689721); operators of iistupid.com and github.com/iireborn.
26th September, 2026
By email to admin@goldentrophy.software and published at https://github.com/iireborn/transparency/blob/main/25_09_26_grayson/response_corgi_002.md
Re: Reply to your email regarding the response dated 25 September 2026
1. Deadline.
Your original notice demanded cure by 30/9/2026, five days from its date. Your email now states the period runs thirty days from receipt, ending 25 October 2026. Good, as § 8 states: cure “prior to 30 days after your receipt of the notice”. The cures described in response_001 §§ 2.1 and 2.2 were completed on 25th September, 2026, inside any reading of the period. The amendment of response_001 § 2.1.1 did not contradict or add onto any core truths and was therefore silently committed.
2. Branding.
The banner was a leftover from before the rebrand, and is scheduled for replacement and will be replaced within the period ending 25 October 2026, which your email identifies. The full name “ii’s Stupid Menu” appears only where “Re: Response to your notices dated 25 September 2026, “Notice of GNU GPL v3 Violation” and “Cease and Desist” (from now on, “response_001”) places it and where your own cease and desist permits it, the license headers, the NOTICE file, and truthful identification of the upstream work. It is not used as branding for any product, server, or property of the Recipients, and any further instance will be removed on identification or (preferably polite) formal request. The two letters “ii”, standing alone, remain in use for the reasons given in response_001 § 3.4, which your email does not answer.
3. discord.gg/iidk.
A vanity URL is a setting of the server it was set on. You set it while you operated the server. The server transferred on 13 August 2026, and its settings went with it. Your first notice states what that sale excluded: “the Marks, their goodwill, or any artwork”, and a server setting is none of those. The September acknowledgment you rely on distinguishes the server, which you sold, from the brand, which is addressed in response_001 § 3.4 on its own terms.
The URL reaches the community you sold, renamed “ii Reborn” and carrying a non-affiliation notice. Your handle remains yours everywhere, and the link does not prevent its use. You have identified no registration, no term of the sale carving the URL out, and no instance of confusion. The demand is, again, declined.
4. ii Engine.
The GitHub Releases statement is accurate. The engine gets the DLL from the public GitHub Releases of iireborn/menu, a repository operated by the Recipients. The Releases page is the designated place under § 6(d), object code and Corresponding Source offered at the same place, at no further charge, with each release identifying the tag it was built from. Section 6(d) requires “clear directions next to the object code saying where to find the Corresponding Source”. The release page provides them.
The engine itself contains no code from the covered work. A separate program that interacts with a covered work at runtime, without incorporating any of it, is not a derivative work. Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc., 964 F.2d 965 (9th Cir. 1992). No GPL obligation attaches to the engine, and the question of how the Recipients license their own original code does not arise under the GPL. The conveyance of the menu occurs at GitHub Releases in compliance with § 6(d), and running the program is unrestricted: § 2 affirms “your unlimited permission to run the unmodified Program”.
5. Tracker.
Your email records that no code claim is being pursued regarding the tracker at this time, therefore the written confirmation in response_001 § 2.3 stands. I accept your concession.
6. Names and domain.
The positions in response_001 §§ 3.3 and 3.4 stand, refused.
7. On further correspondence.
Every point in both of your notices has now been answered, cured, withdrawn, or refused with reasons, and the full record is public at transparency/. Further correspondence that repeats positions already answered, without identifying new material, will be published and acknowledged briefly or not at all. Specific claims, meaning identified material, a registration number, or an instance of actual confusion, will be answered in full.
Nothing in this letter waives any right or remedy of the Recipients, all of which are expressly reserved.
8. Authorization.
I swear, under penalty of perjury, that I am authorized to act on behalf of the Recipients. See response_001 § 6 for Authorization (signed cryptographically), and that the information in this response is accurate.